Nurs FPX 6200 Assessment 2 Care Setting SOAR Analysis

NURS FPX 6200 Assessment 2 Care Setting SOAR Analysis

NURS FPX 6200 Assessment 2 Care Setting SOAR Analysis

Student name

Capella University

Nurs FPX 6200

Professor Name

Submission Date

Care Setting SOAR Analysis

Assessment 2 for NURS FPX 6200: Care Setting SOAR Analysis involves the evaluation of a healthcare organization using the SOAR approach (Strengths, Opportunities, Aspirations, and Results). The main objective of this assessment is to identify organizational strengths, enhance patient safety, develop leadership strategies, and make recommendations for quality improvement. In this guide, students will learn all about the necessary sections of this assignment and get useful writing advice.

Leadership Structure and Promotion of Quality and Safety Goals

The leadership in the care setting appears to be important in advancing quality and safety as well as agenda about medication reconciliation within, especially in their post-discharge activity in the Mayo Clinic. The organization model relies on collaborative leadership which is an interdisciplinary collaboration that promotes a flawed communication between the nurses, pharmacists and the physicians. The focus of leaders on the constant modernization of medication safety and training staff on this matter allow them to reveal and eliminate possible errors (Montaleytang et al., 2021). The culture of responsibility is also built up by the management in terms of its implementation of evidence-based guidelines and the encouragement of dissent to be reported free of any intimidation. Quality debriefing or quality audits made by the leadership are used to evaluate outcomes on a regular basis to determine that they are in line with the macro safety goals of the organization. The structure of this approach facilitates an adherent attitude towards patient-centered care and decrease risks post-discharge on medications error.

Pursuing Improvements in Medication Reconciliation Post-Discharge

To enhance medication reconciliation after discharge in the Mayo Clinic, the care setting may adopt unified digital technologies that can facilitate communication between the hospital and outpatient setting professionals. Probably, leaders should consider implementing the implementation of the use of patient portals to allow patients to play a more proactive role in their care by submitting medication lists and instructions (Daliri et al., 2021). In discharge planning, there could also be an increase in the staffing of pharmacists, to carry competent medication reviews and minimize the incidence of pharmaceutical discrepancies. Defining a follow-up strategy such as placing phone calls by the nursing personnel after discharge may help in gain insight and to remedy any probable medication-related concerns as a real-time measure. The choices will enhance care environments aimed at minimizing the adverse drug events and strengthening patient safety as well as enhancing health essays that align with the organizational aims at quality improvement.

Strengths of the Organization in Promoting Quality and Safety

Without discarding the fact, the Mayo Clinic shows quite a number of strengths that justify quality and safety in medication reconciliation after discharge. The multidisciplinary approach permits collaboration between the nurses, pharmacists, and physicians thereby enhancing medication error possibilities. Medication reconciliation protocol elements are standardized and facilitate discharge the consistency and reliability of mechanisms (Marinović et al., 2021). Moreover, the organization also focuses efforts on the staff training in the field of medication safety. More development of advanced technology systems including electronic health records (EHRs) enhance also accuracy in drug reconciliation as far as communication becomes more efficient and patient data are easily accessed. The last culture is the culture of continual improvement; this is achieved by the culture of accountability and transparency the leadership has created where its employees are proactive in approaching safety issues.

Using Strengths to Achieve Organizational Goals

The Mayo has opportunities that can be utilized strategically to accomplish its objectives of improving the medication reconciliation after discharge. Among these extensions would be the extension of the multidisciplinary collaboration by incorporating a follow-up care team to extend the care continuity. The organization will be able to improve patient engagement and communication with the sophisticated use of new technology such as patient portals and automated software warnings (Costello et al., 2023). The skills of staff members can be preserved by increasing the range of commitments of staff education programs to shorter topics like new trends in medication safety. An accountable culture has the ability to invigorate the design of sympathetic inventive solutions in an effort to curb the negative drug incidents, including pharmacist-facilitated discharge survey. As the organization expands on its strong points, patient safety can be enhanced, the readmission rates can be decreased, and the quality improvement objectives could be achieved.

Area of Concern Identified in the SOAR Analysis

Among the issues that were outlined when conducting the SOAR analysis, there is the lack of consistency of contact with the patients after discharge, thereby affecting the functionality of the medication reconciliation. The organization holds that care and safety involve patient-centered care and care, however, in general, post-discharge communication can have the gaps that lead to medication errors, adverse drug event, or nonadherence (Nymoen et al., 2022). It is particularly relevant to the mission Mayo Clinic works on to offer the highest quality of care and ensure its safety and to its vision of the goal of minimizing preventable readmissions. It is caused by such shortage, as limited staffing and time options to undertake follow-up care in order to create a barrier to effective medication management. Potential to respond to this issue aligns with the values of the organization: accountability, and continuous improvement, as it has implications to patient safety and patient outcomes.

Proposing Improvements in the Area of Concern

In order to prevent the issue with non-parental follow-ups, the Mayo Clinic may establish a special program of post-discharge follow-up conducted by pharmacists or specially trained nursing personnel. A turn-point to one of the elements of this program would be the post-discharge follow-up telephone calls or telehealth call within 48 to 72 hours to discuss medications and concerns of patients. Improved communication and compliance could be implemented with the help of technology like automated medication promotions or patient portals (Rosenstengle et al., 2022). Moreover, this project would become sustainable in case both the staff education about the significance of following up and allocating resources to support this post-discharge continues would be amplified. These would improve the process of medication reconciliation even more, reduce medications-related complications, and align with the mission statement of the organization to provide high-quality and safe care.

Reaching Goals to Improve Quality and Safety

By utilizing its focus on providing patient-centered care and innovation, the Mayo Clinic can achieve its objectives of enhancing quality and patient safety during medication reconciliation in the post-discharge setting. One method through which the organization may avoid any medication error is to simplify medication reconciliation processes by enhancing multidisciplinary teamwork enhancing multidisciplinary teamwork between pharmacists, nurses, and physicians. Technology needs to be increased and utilized to enhance the accuracy and consistency of communicating the medication instructions to patients and caregivers by use of Electronic Health Records (EHRs) and patient portals (Mozafarian et al., 2025). In addition, the emphasis of the Mayo Clinic on evidence-based practices will present the opportunity in standardizing discharge procedures to mitigate the uncertainty of medication sets. This should be an ongoing patient education program, which must be modified to patient needs following discharge according to whose possibility of improving patient compliance with medication and consequently increasing patient safety and quality.

Strategic Initiatives Supporting Organizational Aspirations

The Mayo Clinic may adopt a number of strategic efforts in order to align its goal of making a positive contribution to the targeted objective of lowering readmissions and enhancing medication safety. One of the initiatives can be considered to be the establishment of a pharmacist-based discharge review program, where clearance of all medications and their clarification to the patient should be conducted first in the hospital. The second one is to increase telehealth (such as virtual follow-up appointments about medication management within 72 hours of discharge) (Stuijt et al., 2021). Another practice to be adopted by the clinic in its EHR system is using automated alerts to detect potential drug interactions or replicas in the medication list that will be notified to the providers. Another tool to support patient engagement towards improved adherence is mobile applications or portals that may assist patients in medication memories and educational content. These initiatives are coherent with the mission and vision of the Mayo Clinic of fostering excellence patient care and safety.

Accomplishing Meaningful Quality Outcomes Through Leadership Structure

An effective team and patient-centered approach to leadership by a collaborative structure in the Mayo Clinic are effective to measure meaningful quality outcomes in the field of medication reconciliation after discharge. In this case also, the cultural aspect of leadership encourages interdisciplinary teamwork where the pharmacists, nurses and physicians employ teamwork to successfully reconcile the medications prior to the discharge process. Leaders state that it is necessary to apply evidence-based procedures such as standardized medication reconciliation checklists to provide reliability and reduce the risk of error (Daliri et al., 2020). Additionally, the leadership establishes the spirit of leadership accountability and quality enhancement whereby staff are asked to report their differences and enabled to engage in quality enhancement programs. The leaders do a frequent assessment of gains and take data-driven decisions to bridge gaps and pursue additional intentional interventions to improve their achievement. With this systematic strategy, the strategy will be consistent with the Mayo Clinic mission of delivering quality, safe, and patient-centered care.

Evidence-Based Practices Supporting Leadership’s Approach

Guidance at the Mayo Clinic incorporates evidence-based interventions to improve physician-to-pharmacist handoff practice. Interventions led by the pharmacist that happen at the point of discharge reduce medication errors and adverse drug events and this assists with the interdisciplinary collaboration emphasis of the clinic. Electronic health records (EHRs) having the automated alert system can assist in effective communication as well as in examining the risk of medication interaction. It is also useful in studies to identify the importance of patient education programs that result in adherence and reduced mimicking off (Daliri et al., 2021). The reliability and safety of medication reconciliation processes were planned by the Mayo Clinic leadership according to the Mayo Clinic vision of offering excellence in healthcare delivery.

Relevant Skills and Leadership Characteristics for Quality and Safety Improvement

Leaders need to have some competencies and attributes in order to initiate quality and safety improvement projects, such as the project of improving medication reconciliation post-discharge implemented at the Mayo Clinic. Good verbal communication skills are required to make sure that an interdisciplinary team of nurses, pharmacists, and physicians collaborates properly. Patients need and require empathy as well as active listening about their needs and concerns during the discharge process. It also demands leaders to be flexible and problem-solve to resolve issues like how to tackle differences in the list of medication or lack of follow-up care. Visionary leadership is essential to encourage the collective of people to deliver high-quality patient-centered care by ensuring that these components are aligned with the vision of organizational leadership (Dalieri et al., 2020). Additionally, a culture of responsibility and learning allows ensuring that the staff is not complacent and motivates them to enhance both processes and practise on the evidence. These are essential leadership qualities in order to make a meaningful change in medication safety and achievement of organizational objectives.

Areas of Uncertainty or Knowledge Gaps

Regardless of the strengths of the Mayo Clinic, there are areas where there still exist areas of uncertainty in medication reconciliation after discharge. One of the gaps is that there is no incisive knowledge on how patients adhere to medications only after discharging the hospital thus it is impossible to identify any particular obstacles to drug adherence. Even more, the key uncertainty, as it is called, is determining the most effective methods of involving patients in follow-up care and particularly in patients with low health literacy (Mozafarian et al., 2025). The other gap in knowledge is a way of maximizing technology, including EHRs, in this environment, to aid medication reconciliation processes. Moreover, pharmacist led strategies work successfully, although the issues of scaling and effectiveness of the interventions on all departmental scales are observed. These gaps would require research and pilot work to assist in overcoming medication safety in order to improve upon these aims at the Mayo Clinic of quality improvement.

Conclusion

To sum up, a SOAR analysis helps to gain important insights into the sources of strength, opportunities, ambitions, and outcomes that can drive medication reconciliation improvements after discharge. The collaborative structure of leadership, the evidence-supported practice, and patient-centered care characteristic of the organization allow healthcare professionals to address gaps and uncertainty and, therefore, enhance the safer and quality results of care delivery. High-quality care delivery and minimization of medication-related complications is the mission of the organization, and strategic initiatives are aligned with its mission, such as pharmacist-led intervention and the enhancement of follow-up. Lastly, these results can serve the foundation of developing a general strategic plan regarding enhancing patient safety and healthcare provision.

If you are also looking for 1st assessment of this class visit: NURS FPX 6200 Assessment 1

Step-By-Step Instructions To COMPLETE Nurs FPX 6200 Assessment 2

Get free sample from Top My Course to understand structure, APA formating and content.

Related assessments for this class:

NURS FPX 6200 Assessment 1
NURS FPX 6200 Assessment 3
NURS FPX 6200 Assessment 3
NURS FPX 6200 Assessment 5

References for Nurs FPX 6200 Assessment 2

You can use these references in your Nurs fpx 6200 assessment 2 to strengthen your work.

Costello, J., Barras, M., Foot, H., & Cottrell, N. (2023). The impact of hospital-based post-discharge pharmacist medication review on patient clinical outcomes: A systematic review. Exploratory Research in Clinical and Social Pharmacy11, 12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcsop.2023.100305

Cole, M. L., Stavros, J. M., Cox, J., & Stavros, A. (2022). Measuring strengths, opportunities, aspirations, and results: Psychometric properties of the 12-item SOAR scale. Frontiers in Psychology13(13). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.854406

Daliri, S., Bouhnouf, M., van de Meerendonk, H. W. P. C., Buurman, B. M., Scholte Op Reimer, W. J. M., Kooij, M. J., & Karapinar-Çarkit, F. (2021). Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy17(4), 677–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.05.022

Daliri, S., Boujarfi, S., el Mokaddam, A., Scholte op Reimer, W. J. M., ter Riet, G., den Haan, C., Buurman, B. M., & Karapinar-Çarkit, F. (2020). British Medical Journal30(2), 146–156. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2020-010927

Marinović, I., Bačić Vrca, V., Samardžić, I., Marušić, S., Grgurević, I., Papić, I., Grgurević, D., Brkić, M., Jambrek, N., & Mesarić, J. (2021). Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeuticshttps://doi.org/10.1111/jcpt.13431

Montaleytang, M., Correard, F., Spiteri, C., Boutier, P., Gayet, S., Honore, S., Villani, P., & Daumas, A. (2021). Medication reconciliation in the geriatric unit: Impact on the maintenance of post-hospitalization prescriptions. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy43(5), 1183–1190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-021-01229-y

Mozafarian, B., Farzanegan, F., & Sepehri, M. (2025). A post-discharge process framework to improve follow-up, medication reconciliation, patient satisfaction, and readmission rate in pediatric hospitalhttps://conference.modares.ac.ir/files/site1/rds_journals/2682/article-2682-4985.pdf

Nymoen, L. D., Flatebø, T. E., Moger, T. A., Øie, E., Molden, E., & Viktil, K. K. (2022). Public Library of Science17(9), 12. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274907

Rosenstengle, C., Kripalani, S., & Rahimi, R. S. (2022). Journal of Hospital Medicine17(S1). https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.12896

Stuijt, C. C. M., Bekker, C. L., van den Bemt, B. J. F., & Karapinar, F. (2021). Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy17(8), 1426–1432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.10.012

Best Professors To Choose For Nurs FPX 6200

  • Dr. Linda Hayes (EdD, MBA, BS)

  • Dr. T. Ray Ruffin (DBA, MHA, MS, MA)

  • Dr. Dan Fisher (PhD, MHA)

  • Dr. Yvonne Alles (DHA, MBA)

FAQs Related Nurs FPX 6200 Assessment 2

Why Do Students Need This Guide?

This guide was created by our experts for helping nursing students understand SOAR analysis, QI model, patient safety frameworks, and APA 7 style. It has been created to make healthcare management concepts easier while promoting self-study in academia.

How do I structure my NURS FPX 6200 Assessment 2 paper?

Typically, it should include an introduction, SOAR analysis of your chosen care setting, evidence-based strategies, and a conclusion with recommendations.

    Claim your free sample today, click to download!
    Verification is necessary to ensure access for nursing students & to avoid bots.

      Verification is necessary to ensure access for nursing students & to avoid bots.
      Claim your free sample today, click to download!

        Access the full assessment instructions now.
        Verification is necessary to ensure access for nursing students & to avoid bots.

          Verification is necessary to ensure access for nursing students & to avoid bots.
          Access the full assessment instructions now.

            Fill out the form to access detailed references instantly.
            Verification is necessary to ensure access for nursing students & to avoid bots.

              Verification is necessary to ensure access for nursing students & to avoid bots.
              Fill out the form to access detailed references instantly.

                Please pick the professor for your Class.
                Verification is necessary to ensure access for nursing students & to avoid bots.

                  Verification is necessary to ensure access for nursing students & to avoid bots.
                  Please pick the professor for your Class.

                    Fill the quick form and get access to FAQ’s.
                    Verification is necessary to ensure access for nursing students & to avoid bots.

                      Verification is necessary to ensure access for nursing students & to avoid bots.
                      Fill the quick form and get access to FAQ’s.
                      Scroll to Top