Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources
Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) is an approach with which healthcare organizations can get in-depth knowledge about diseases and their treatment which will help to provide the best quality of care. Criteria establishment and application of the proper model will be helpful for helpful in using EBP treatment for patients. The IOWA model is one of the best models used by healthcare organizations so that decision-making procedures will become easy and fulfill EBP (Cullen et al., 2022). This assessment is designed to provide accurate criteria of EBP to the healthcare personnel regarding diabetes prevention, control, and early diagnosis. NURS FPX 4030 Assessment 2 Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources
The Quality or Safety Issue that can benefit from Evidence-based Practices
In Villa Hospital, the quality and safety issue regarding diabetes control and diagnosis that could benefit from an evidence-based approach is the issue of misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis of diabetes. Studies have shown that misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis of diabetes can have serious consequences, such as the development of diabetic complications, hospitalizations, and even death. Misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis can lead to unnecessary and costly medical tests and treatments (Chou et al., 2021). The EBP model will help healthcare staff to develop standardized diagnostic criteria and protocols for healthcare providers, as well as education and training programs to improve their understanding and ability to diagnose diabetes accurately and in a timely manner. Furthermore, implementing systems for regular diabetes screening and follow-up care could help prevent misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis (Fitria et al., 2018).
Rationale for the Benefit of Applying an Evidence-Based Approach
The rationale behind applying an evidence-based approach to diabetes control and diagnosis is that it can improve accuracy, patient outcomes, cost-effectiveness, standardization, and continuous improvement. By implementing evidence-based practices, healthcare providers can provide high-quality care based on the latest scientific research, which will help reduce the mortality rate due to diabetes (Fitria et al., 2018).
Criteria for Determining Credibility of Resources
Nurses play an important role in determining the credibility resources. They must ensure that their information is accurate, reliable, and up-to-date. The first and foremost criterion is to consider the objectivity of a journal. Nurses should consider whether the resource presents an objective perspective. For example, a website that presents both the benefits and risks of diabetes treatment is likely more credible than one that only presents the benefits. Moreover, Nurses should consider whether the resource has been peer-reviewed, which means that other experts have evaluated it in the field for its accuracy, relevance, and significance. Therefore, journal articles and websites can be helpful for healthcare staff to address in-depth research on diabetes issues in a healthcare institution so that desired outcomes can be achieved (Panadero & Alqassab, 2019).
Ways to Apply Criteria to a Specific Resource
American Diabetes Association (ADA) website is considered a credible resource that nurses can use to support their practice in diabetes management as it fulfills all the criteria. The website provides accurate and reliable information on diabetes management, with references and sources for the information provided. The website is updated regularly, and the information presented is consistent with current research and best practices (Holt et al., 2021).
Credibility and Relevance of Evidence and Resources
Analysis of the reliability and credibility of evidence-based resources consists of several factors. A combination of these factors is called the CRAAP test, which focuses on a particular website’s currency, authority, accuracy, relevance, and objectivity. NURS FPX 4030 Assessment 2 Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources. First, the source of the evidence or resource should be considered. Is the organization or author reputable and well-respected in diabetes care? Second, the accuracy and reliability of the information provided should be evaluated. Are references and sources provided for the information presented? Finally, the timeliness of the information should be considered (Esparrago-Kalidas, 2021).
NURS FPX 4030 Assessment 2 Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources
The most credible resource and peer-reviewed article that focuses on early diagnosis and prevention of diabetes are written by Thornton Snider et al. (2019) with the title “Lifetime benefits of early detection and treatment of diabetic kidney disease,” published in the journal PLoS One. The article is from the last five years, which means it is up to date. The article is relevant to diabetes prevention and early diagnosis, as early detection and prevention of diabetes can reduce the risk of kidney disease. NURS FPX 4030 assessment 2 determining the credibility of evidence and resources. This article is also authorized, accurate, and contains an objective as it is published in reputable journals.
The Importance of Incorporating Credible Evidence into an Evidence-Based Practice Model
The IOWA Model is a framework used to guide evidence-based practice, which involves integrating the best available research evidence, clinical expertise, and patient values and preferences to inform clinical decision-making (Chiwaula et al., 2021). By incorporating credible evidence into the IOWA Model, healthcare professionals can ensure that they are using the most up-to-date and relevant information to inform their clinical decision-making. One benefit of incorporating credible evidence into the IOWA Model is that it can improve patient outcomes. For example, using evidence-based interventions for diabetes prevention and early diagnosis can help to reduce the incidence of diabetes and its associated complications, which can improve the overall health and well-being of patients. Another benefit of incorporating credible evidence into the IOWA Model is that it can help to reduce healthcare costs. Evidence-based interventions are often more cost-effective than traditional ones, based on research that has demonstrated their effectiveness in reducing healthcare costs while maintaining or improving patient outcomes (Chiwaula et al., 2021).
Conclusion
Evidence-Based Practice will help to provide in-depth knowledge about diabetes early diagnosis and prevention. The criteria for determining the credibility of resources was to evaluate the accuracy, objectivity, relevancy, and timeframe of relevant articles. With the help of EBP, healthcare staff can provide the best quality treatment to the patients and diagnose diabetes in the early stages to avoid mortality.
References
Chiwaula, C. H., Kanjakaya, P., Chipeta, D., Chikatipwa, A., Kalimbuka, T., Zyambo, L., Nkata, S., & Jere, D. L. (2021). Introducing evidence based practice in nursing care delivery, utilizing the Iowa model in intensive care unit at Kamuzu Central Hospital, Malawi. International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences, 14, 100272.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijans.2020.100272
Chou, M.-Y., Huang, S.-T., Liang, C.-K., Peng, L.-N., Lin, Y.-T., Hsiao, F.-Y., & Chen, L.-K. (2021). All-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, major cardiovascular events and hypoglycaemia of patients with diabetes onset at an older age: results from the 10-year nationwide cohort study. Age and Ageing, 50(6), 2094–2104.
https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afab183
Cullen, L., Hanrahan, K., Edmonds, S. W., Reisinger, H. S., & Wagner, M. (2022). Iowa implementation for sustainability framework. Implementation Science, 17(1).
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-021-01157-5
Esparrago-Kalidas, A. J. (2021). The effectiveness of CRAAP test in evaluating credibility of sources. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 1(2), 1–14.
http://i-jte.org/index.php/journal/article/view/25
Fitria, N., van Asselt, A. D. I., & Postma, M. J. (2018). Cost-effectiveness of controlling gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review. The European Journal of Health Economics, 20(3), 407–417.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-018-1006-y
Holt, R. I. G., DeVries, J. H., Hess-Fischl, A., Hirsch, I. B., Kirkman, M. S., Klupa, T., Ludwig, B., Nørgaard, K., Pettus, J., Renard, E., Skyler, J. S., Snoek, F. J., Weinstock, R. S., & Peters, A. L. (2021). The management of type 1 diabetes in adults. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European association for the study of diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care, 44(11).
https://doi.org/10.2337/dci21-0043
Panadero, E., & Alqassab, M. (2019). An empirical review of anonymity effects in peer assessment, peer feedback, peer review, peer evaluation and peer grading. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(8), 1253–1278.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1600186
Thornton Snider, J., Sullivan, J., van Eijndhoven, E., Hansen, M. K., Bellosillo, N., Neslusan, C., O’Brien, E., Riley, R., Seabury, S., & Kasiske, B. L. (2019). Lifetime benefits of early detection and treatment of diabetic kidney disease. PLOS ONE, 14(5), 0217487.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217487