NURS FPX 4030 Assessment 1 Locating Credible Databases and Research

NURS FPX 4030 Assessment 1 Locating Credible Databases and Research

Locating Credible Databases and Research

Evidence-based practice (EBP) is an approach to decision-making and problem-solving professionally, particularly in fields such as medicine, nursing, psychology, education, and social work. Diabetes is considered to be one of the major concerns around the globe. According to CDC, 37 million people in America have diabetes (CDC, 2021). Diabetes is a chronic disease that directly influences individuals’ well-being and lifestyle. Diabetes occurs due to excessive use of sugar which can cause eyesight issues, gangrene, and hyperglycemia. This assessment is designed to highlight communication strategies with which nurses’ capabilities can be approved. Along with this, the discussion is also made regarding evidence-based practices for diagnosing and managing diabetes. 

NURS FPX 4030 Assessment 1 Locating Credible Databases and Research.

Communication Strategies to Encourage Diagnosis-Based Research

Diabetes management is a complex process that requires collaboration among various healthcare professionals. Nurses can collaborate with other healthcare professionals to provide comprehensive patient care (Sørensen et al., 2020). To diagnose and control diabetes early, focus on better care coordination and effective patient communication. New hired nurses need to be educated and trained on the latest evidence-based practices for early diagnosis and management of diabetes. Nurses can use shared decision-making to involve patients in the early diagnosis and management of diabetes. It is also essential to get feedback from the nurses to enhance their knowledge of nurses (Yu et al., 2022).

Benefits of these Strategies in Building Professional Competence

With effective communication and collaboration techniques, diabetic patient lifestyle can be improved, and healthcare organizations can diagnose diabetes in its early stages. A shared decision-making process will help to understand diabetic patients’ concerns more accurately and provide them with the best quality of care. Feedback from nurses will also help provide EBP treatment to the patients. Effective communication between patients and healthcare staff will enhance patient satisfaction and develop a cooperative environment to improve the organization’s overall performance (Yu et al., 2022). 

Best Places to Complete Research within the Workplace Environment

The medical field requires in-depth research. The healthcare staff’s goal is to know about updated interventions and techniques to detect and control diabetes earlier. Information and knowledge can be collected via online and offline resources. Offline resources can include medical textbooks, journals, conferences, and consultations with healthcare professionals (Arifah et al., 2022). These resources can provide in-depth and personalized information on the diagnosis and treatment of diabetes. Online resources include websites, databases, and search engines that provide information on diabetes, such as PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov (Alag, 2020). These resources can provide access to research, guidelines, and expert opinions on the diagnosis and treatment of diabetes.

Types of Resources for Accessing the Information

To know more about diabetes in-depth, various other primary and secondary data sources are also there for healthcare staff. Primary sources like Surveys, patient interviews, and EHR technologies will help to know about the patient’s condition more accurately and precisely (Assiri, 2022). Different reference books and medical databases are considered secondary resources from which healthcare staff can get excessive knowledge regarding diabetes. To evaluate the credibility and reliability of resources, the CRAAP test is used, which will provide information regarding the currency, relevance, authority, accuracy, and purpose of journals or sources to ensure that the information gathered is accurate and evidence-based (Esparrago-Kalidas, 2021). 

Reasons for Utilizing the Places for Getting Data within the Healthcare Setting

Medical Library and EHR technology will help to collect in-depth information regarding diabetes treatment and diagnosis. These two resources are genuine and provide accurate information regarding medical concerns. EHR helps to detect patients’ updated condition frequently and can help to manage disease efficiently (Assiri, 2022). 

The Best Online Resource for the Evidence Collection

The best online resources to collect in-depth knowledge about diabetes control and prevention are PubMed, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, CINAHL, and Medline. 

PubMed

PubMed is a database maintained by the National Library of Medicine that provides access to millions of research articles in the biomedical sciences, including diabetes research (Manca et al., 2020). It is valuable for finding peer-reviewed articles on diabetes treatment, diagnosis, and management.

Cochrane Library

The Cochrane Library is a database collection that provides high-quality, independent evidence to inform healthcare decision-making. It is a particularly useful resource for finding systematic reviews of interventions for diabetes management (Garritty et al., 2021).

ClinicalTrials.gov

  ClinicalTrials.gov is a database of clinical trials conducted around the world. It can be a valuable resource for finding ongoing or completed clinical trials on diabetes treatment and management (Zippel & Bohnet-Joschko, 2021).

Medline

Medline is a database maintained by the United States National Library of Medicine (NLM). It provides access to millions of research articles in the biomedical sciences, including diabetes research (Pita Costa et al., 2021).

CINAHL

 Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature is a database that provides access to a wide range of nursing and allied health research, including diabetes treatment and prevention (Matsuda & Yoshimura, 2023).

Why are these Resources Credible Evidence-based Resources?

All these resources are beneficial for knowing about diabetes diagnosis and treatment. The credibility of these sources is that they all provide peer-reviewed papers regarding medicine and the treatment of diabetes (Esparrago-Kalidas, 2021). Moreover, these resources also provide accurate and updated information regarding diabetes. Additionally, healthcare staff does not have to pay any cost as these resources are free. Nurses will learn about diabetes concerns more in-depth and provide evidence-based treatment to the patients. 

Conclusion 

Diabetes is considered to be a global health concern. Healthcare staff’s effective communication and collaboration will help to diagnose diabetes at its early stages. Moreover, to provide the best quality treatment to the patients, healthcare staff must get education regarding updated interventions to control diabetes. Different online and offline resources will help to collect detailed information regarding diabetes diagnosis and treatment in the early stages. 

References

Alag, S. (2020). Unique insights from ClinicalTrials.gov by mining protein mutations and RSids in addition to applying the Human Phenotype Ontology. PLOS ONE, 15(5), 0233438.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233438 

Arifah, F. H., Nugroho, A. E., Rohman, A., & Sujarwo, W. (2022). A review of medicinal plants for the treatment of diabetes mellitus: The case of Indonesia. South African Journal of Botany, 149, 537–558.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2022.06.042

Assiri, G. (2022). The impact of patient access to their Electronic Health Record on medication management safety: A narrative review. Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsps.2022.01.001

CDC. (2021, December 16). What is Diabetes? Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/basics/diabetes.html#:~:text=Diabetes%20is%20a%20chronic%20(long

Esparrago-Kalidas, A. J. (2021). The effectiveness of CRAAP test in evaluating credibility of sources. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 1(2), 1–14.

http://i-jte.org/index.php/journal/article/view/25

Garritty, C., Gartlehner, G., Nussbaumer-Streit, B., King, V. J., Hamel, C., Kamel, C., Affengruber, L., & Stevens, A. (2021). Cochrane rapid reviews methods group offers evidence-informed guidance to conduct rapid reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 130(130), 13–22.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.10.007

Manca, A., Cugusi, L., Cortegiani, A., Ingoglia, G., Moher, D., & Deriu, F. (2020). Predatory journals enter biomedical databases through public funding. BMJ, m4265.

https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m4265

Matsuda, S., & Yoshimura, H. (2023). Impact of oral health management on mental health and psychological disease: a scoping review. Journal of International Medical Research, 51(1), 030006052211471.

https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605221147186

Pita Costa, J., Rei, L., Stopar, L., Fuart, F., Grobelnik, M., Mladenić, D., Novalija, I., Staines, A., Pääkkönen, J., Konttila, J., Bidaurrazaga, J., Belar, O., Henderson, C., Epelde, G., Gabaráin, M. A., Carlin, P., & Wallace, J. (2021). NewsMeSH: A new classifier designed to annotate health news with MeSH headings. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 114, 102053.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2021.102053

Sørensen, M., Groven, K. S., Gjelsvik, B., Almendingen, K., & Garnweidner-Holme, L. (2020). The roles of healthcare professionals in diabetes care: a qualitative study in Norwegian general practice. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, 38(1), 12–23.

https://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2020.1714145

Yu, X., Chau, J. P. C., Huo, L., Li, X., Wang, D., Wu, H., & Zhang, Y. (2022). The effects of a nurse-led integrative medicine-based structured education program on self-management behaviors among individuals with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: A randomized controlled trial. BMC Nursing, 21(1).

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-00970-7

Zippel, C., & Bohnet-Joschko, S. (2021). Rise of clinical studies in the field of machine learning: A review of data registered in ClinicalTrials.gov. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(10), 5072.

https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18105072

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Please Enter Active Contact Information for Access Code

    "Verification is necessary to ensure access for nursing students & to avoid bots."
    Please provide your valid contact information to Get access to the sample paper

      Please Enter Active Contact Information for Access Code

      "Verification is necessary to ensure access for nursing students & to avoid bots."
      Please provide your valid contact information to Get access to the sample paper
      Scroll to Top
      ×