NURS FPX 4005 Assessment 3 Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal
Student name
Capella University
NURSFPX4005
Professor Name
Submission Date
Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal
The inefficient medication reconciliation is a problem that persists in Riverside Community Hospital due to the slow, unfinished, and erroneous flow of communication among nurses, physicians, and pharmacists. The research shows that inadequate interdisciplinary communication is one of the significant contributors to medication errors and poor patient outcomes (Herrmann et al., 2022). This proposal presents an interdisciplinary enhancement proposal that should be used to enhance communication operations and make teamwork effective. The vision is to reduce medication errors and improve patient safety and workflow efficiency in departments through the deployment of coordinated communication tools and standardized workflow.
NURS FPX 4005 Assessment 3 is about creating an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan proposal in response to a problem concerning quality or safety in health care. In this assessment, students need to determine an organization’s problem, suggest ways to collaborate, incorporate leadership and change theories, and discuss the resources needed for its implementation. This guide contains a full example, writing tips, APA guidelines, and expert advice to help students complete their assessments.
Objective
This plan aims to revamp the care transition process at Riverstone Medical Center by adding structured interdisciplinary communication tools and regular team huddles. The goal is to boost communication and coordination among healthcare pros, which should cut down on mistakes, delays, and info gaps when moving patients around. It’ll support the hospital’s dedication to continuous and patient-focused care. Not only that, but it’s also hoped this will boost patient happiness, lower unnecessary readmissions, and help use healthcare resources better. On top of everything else, this plan wants to tighten up teamwork, making staff more accountable and collaborative. All in all, this is supposed to enhance the quality of care and make patient handling smoother at Riverstone Medical Center.
This project seeks to decrease medication errors, avoid delays in updating medications, and achieve better patient outcomes in the transition of care process. Another goal of this project will be to foster interprofessional teamwork through mutual responsibility and efficient communication. Moreover, this strategy seeks to assist organizations in meeting their goals concerning patient safety, quality improvement, and decreasing hospital readmission rates.
Questions and Predictions
- What is the impact of the daily use of interdisciplinary huddles on the accuracy of medication reconciliation?
It will be better in 4-6 weeks when the workflows will be harmonized, and the situation will be actively distributed.
- Does the implementation of organized SBAR communication improve the promptness of the exchange of medication information?
SBAR will reduce delays in the pharmaceutical update by at least 30% due to structured and uninterrupted communication.
- What is the extra amount of time that nurses, pharmacists, and physicians will spend in daily huddles?
The huddles will save time compared to time wastage, as the huddles will be about 5 minutes average daily per patient, but save more time overall due to the prevention of rework and error (Pimentel et al., 2021).
- Will an increased collaboration among disciplines result in patient outcomes, including fewer readmissions or adverse drug events?
The collaboration will be enhanced, and the discrepancies will be detected earlier, which will lead to improved outcomes.
- Do structured checklists decrease medication reconciliation variability?
Yes, checklists will streamline the process and reduce omissions, particularly in high-risk drugs.
Change Theories and Leadership Strategies
The Lewin Change Theory would provide a methodical way of informing the process of improving medication reconciliation in Riverside Community Hospital. At the unfreezing stage, the leadership will present recent statistics of medication-related errors, arrange staff meetings to discuss the workflow problems, and sensitize the staff about the risks of poor patient safety due to wrong reconciliation. The change stage will implement SBAR communication and a structured medication reconciliation checklist in the target team, as well as initiate daily interdisciplinary huddles in the high-volume units such as the ICU and the medical-surgical floors. The refreezing will be the final step and will entail the sustainability of these changes by integrating the new tools in the unit policies, engaging in consistent training and monthly audit, and rewarding the teams who are identified to be in consistent compliance (McMahon et al., 2024).
Transformational leadership will also complement the success of this plan by empowering and motivating the employees towards a shared objective that is zero-harm medication administration. Nurse managers and pharmacy leaders will share this vision openly, encourage workers to share ideas on how things can be better during the huddle, and even reward appropriate and timely communication initiatives. The modeling of the use of SBAR and checklists in themselves serves as a demonstration of credibility and strengthening of expectations by the leader (Yun et al., 2023). In addition, they will encourage the culture of trust and psychological safety, in which team members will not fear asking questions, clarifications, and freely cooperate. These change and leadership interventions will develop efficient buy-in, have a positive impact on teamwork, and enable continuous improvement in medication reconciliation changes.
Team Collaboration Strategy
The implementation process will be undertaken successfully since well-defined roles are provided for who, what, where, and when. Nurses will initiate medication reconciliation immediately after patients are admitted to the hospital, and with the assistance of SBAR, such discrepancies will be reported. They will do this at the bedside, during handoff, and in the daily huddle. The physicians will read and confirm medication lists, and irregularities identified by the staff will be corrected. They will do that during rounding and interdisciplinary meetings, preferably within the first six hours of admission. Pharmacists are going to check medications, dosages, and interactions of drugs, and high-risk medications specifically (Szilvay et al., 2021). They will be operating in the pharmacy, the medication rooms, and the huddle rooms, consulting the cases on a daily basis and discussing them during the huddle. Communication strategy implementation, compliance monitoring, and staff support will be under the responsibility of the unit nurse manager as a result of weekly audits and regular visits to the unit.
To ease such roles, a number of collaboration techniques will be used to help the team effectively work towards the objective of the plan. The interdisciplinary huddles, which will be held on a daily basis, will enhance real-time communication, reduce workflow fragmentation, and facilitate the feeling of collective responsibility. The SBAR structure will provide an interdisciplinary communication framework, reduce cases of miscommunication, and provide an effective emergency medicine problem escalation system (Choi and Chang, 2021). In addition, a standardized EMR-based medication reconciliation checklist will be implemented to ensure that the colleagues will approach the process in the same way, minimize inconsistency in documentation, and ensure a sense of responsibility. These practices of collaboration that are combined will improve teamwork and precision, and the timeliness of medication reconciliation.
Effective interdisciplinary interventions, e.g., pharmacist-directed rounds of medication review, nurse-to-pharmacist double-checks, and physician-to-pharmacist oversight with a shift change, have shown a large decrease in errors and enhanced workflow efficiency in real-life hospital settings. An example is that hospitals that have instituted pharmacist involvement in the daily rounds have experienced enhanced medication accuracy and low adverse drug events as the pharmacists are able to offer expert verification at the point of care. The responses to these questions are that Riverside Community Hospital can utilize evidence-based practices in the following ways: to implement standardized reconciliation procedures, proactively review high-risk medications by pharmacists, and use electronic handoff tools to avoid communication gaps.
Required Organizational Resources
The number of changes in the staffing required in order to execute this plan will be minimal, and the existing staff will be utilized effectively. All members of the staff will be required to spend 5-10 minutes per day in daily huddles, and the nurse manager will provide short-term oversight to monitor the early adoption. The involvement of the pharmacists is expected to be achieved by making some minor changes in the working schedule of these professionals. The current workforce arrangement in Riverside Community Hospital can manage these changes. The best use of the available staff is accompanied by the fact that the enhancement of interdisciplinary communication can frequently require a change of working process rather than the employment of new people (Janssens et al., 2024).
The supply and equipment requirements are not as high as the hospital already has a large amount of the resources needed. It will require little IT customization to introduce an EMR-constructed medication reconciliation checklist, which is around 1,000-3,000. SBAR templates and quick guides are low-cost to print (less than 50- 100). The interdisciplinary huddles may be conducted in the available unit workrooms and conference rooms, and the personnel will continue to get the EMR system and patient census information of the hospital without paying any access costs anymore. The studies suggest that formal safety tools, such as SBAR and EMR-based checklists, can be used to improve medication communication with significant effects with minimum resource consumption (Browning et al., 2025).
The short-term investment, in terms of money, would be the time spent on training the employees, upgrading the IT to allow integration of the checklists, and printing of educational materials. These costs are offset by the savings in the long term as a result of avoiding adverse drug events, reducing hospitalization, reducing liability risks, and improving efficiency in the workflow. The adoption of the plan discussed would enable the hospital to keep on realizing medication errors, high readmission rates, burnout among staff, and even legal or regulatory penalties that would incur significantly greater financial and operational expenses. As the examples of real-life situations show, hospitals that do not invest in the implementation of coordinated communication systems experience a rising cost. As an example, a study established that hospitals that failed to incorporate interdisciplinary team communication systems recorded 25 times higher rates of medication errors, which directly affected their financial areas since they were forced to count malpractice claims and operational inefficiencies. Not investing to enhance communication would put Riverside a risk of compromising patient safety, as well as incur unwarranted expenses that would otherwise be prevented by timely and effective intervention.
Conclusion
Unclear medication outlining practices remain severe safety and financial risks at Riverside Community Hospital. Implementation of formal interdisciplinary tools such as daily huddles, SBAR communication, and EMR-based checklists can significantly enhance accuracy and cooperation among the team members in relation to medications. This strategy will offer a powerful, well-founded approach to patient safety and efficiency of workflow improvement, which will be based on the Change Theory created by Lewin and transformational leadership. Overall, the proposed plan will be able to reduce the number of mistakes, improve collaboration, and lead to better performance of the organization.
Step-By-Step Instructions To Write NURS FPX 4005 Assessment 3
Instructions for the NURS FPX 4005 Assessment 3 Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal will be uploaded soon.
References for NURS FPX 4005 Assessment 3
You can use these references on your NURS FPX 4005 Assessment 3:
Journal of Nursing Management, 2025(1). https://doi.org/10.1155/jonm/5585723
Choi, Y.-R., & Chang, S. O. (2021). Journal of Interprofessional Care, 37(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2021.1985985
Herrmann, T. A., Gray, N., & Petrova, O. (2022). Staff perceptions of interdisciplinary team training and its effectiveness in reducing medical errors. International Journal of Healthcare Management, 16(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/20479700.2022.2097762
Janssens, M., Samantha, Nicoleta Meslec, Beerepoot, L. V., & Th, R. (2024). Group & Organization Management, 50(5-6), 1841–1875. https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011241303982
McMahon, K., Mugge, R., & Hultink, E. J. (2024). Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107568
Pimentel, C. B., Snow, A. L., Carnes, S. L., Shah, N. R., Loup, J. R., Vallejo-Luces, T. M., Madrigal, C., & Hartmann, C. W. (2021). Journal of General Internal Medicine, 36(9), 2772–2783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-06632-9
Yun, J.-M., Lee, Y. J., Kang, K., & Park, J.-M. (2023). BioMed Central BMC Medical Education, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04495-8
Related Assessment for this class:
Best Professors To Choose For NURS FPX 4005
- Dr. Jill Alred (PhD, MSAD, BS)
- Dr. Marilyn Bookbinder (PhD)
- Dr. Tiffani Armstrong (DNP, MSN, BSN)





